🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are increasingly enabling the far right to set the political agenda, according to a recent study carried out in Germany.

Researchers discovered that this trend has unwittingly benefited radical groups by validating their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Study Based on Over 20 Years of News Coverage

The findings, released in the European Journal of Political Research, relied on an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 news pieces from six national newspapers.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the late 1990s to central themes like integration and immigration, mainstream parties increasingly adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adaptation amplified the spread of these concepts and signaled to voters that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public discourse by established parties is crucial in the voting performance of the far right," explained a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional parties were condemning the far right. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is crucial."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Across Europe

While the research was focused on Germany, this normalisation effect is likely to affect countries throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," explained another researcher. "Radical groups says something and everybody begins discussing it for one week."

"Even if you're countering it, you're echoing it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At times, political figures have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a then German chancellor advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be found across the continent, as elected officials from countries including the United Kingdom to France embrace the rhetoric of the far right, particularly on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was unthinkable a decade ago.

Core Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing societal topics – migration, integration – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the far right, that's the essence of agenda setting," explained a researcher.

Some political parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the strict platform of the far right, despite studies suggests that this approach leads the electorate to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of data gathered revealed that the impact of radical parties had been gradual and had increased over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "But if you hear this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by established political organizations, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Own Discourses

The study highlighted the necessity for mainstream political parties to develop their own discourses, particularly on topics such as migration and integration, rather than continuously following the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one researcher. "When the leader is radical and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."